|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Outcomes of Civil Protective Orders: Results From One State
Charles L. Diviney1*,
Asha Parekh2,
and
Lenora M. Olson3
1 Salt Lake Area Domestic Violence Coalition
2 Salt Lake Family Justice Center
3 Intermountain Injury Control Research Center, University of Utah
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cdivineyiii{at}yahoo.com.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This study compares final sentencing decisions ordered by judges to federal and state sentencing guidelines for protective order violations. The authors reviewed violations that were pled before the largest district court in Utah and found that in the majority of cases, defendants were not sentenced in accordance with federal and state guidelines. Although state guidelines mandate defendants who violate a protective order to attend a batterer intervention program, less than one fourth of defendants were sentenced to attend such programs. Fewer than half of the defendants were arrested and incarcerated, as opposed to the 100% mandated by state sentencing guidelines. Federal guidelines mandate that all defendants be ordered to surrender firearms, but only six defendants were given that order. This study shows that the judicial system could be more aggressive in improving the safety of victims of intimate partner violence by using the full extent of the sentencing guidelines.
First published on August 13, 2008, doi:10.1177/0886260508322185
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009;24:1209.
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
