|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Reliability Reporting Across Studies Using the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory
Matt Vassar, PhD*
and
William Hale
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: matt.vassar{at}okstate.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Empirical research on anger and hostility has pervaded the academic literature for more than 50 years. Accurate measurement of anger/hostility and subsequent interpretation of results requires that the instruments yield strong psychometric properties. For consistent measurement, reliability estimates must be calculated with each administration, because changes in sample characteristics may alter the scales ability to generate reliable scores. Therefore, the present study was designed to address reliability reporting practices for a widely used anger assessment, the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Of the 250 published articles reviewed, 11.2% calculated and presented reliability estimates for the data at hand, 6.8% cited estimates from a previous study, and 77.1% made no mention of score reliability. Mean alpha estimates of scores for BDHI subscales generally fell below acceptable standards. Additionally, no detectable pattern was found between reporting practices and publication year or journal prestige. Areas for future research are also discussed.
First published on March 31, 2008, doi:10.1177/0886260508314931
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009;24:20.
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|