Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0886260507313531v1
23/5/571    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gidycz, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gidycz, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Prediction of Women's Utilization of Resistance Strategies in a Sexual Assault Situation: A Prospective Study

Christine A. Gidycz*, Amy Van Wynsberghe, and Katie M. Edwards

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gidycz{at}ohio.edu.


  Abstract
The present study prospectively explored the predictors of resistance strategies to a sexual assault situation. Participants were assessed at the beginning of an academic quarter on a number of variables, including past history of sexual victimization, perceived risk of sexual victimization, and intentions to use specific types of resistance strategies. Only women who reported being victimized over the interim (N=68) were included in the analyses, which suggested that women’s Time 1 intentions to utilize assertive resistance strategies (e.g., physically fight, run away) and offender aggression predicted women’s use of assertive resistance strategies in response to the assault that occurred over the follow-up. Women’s utilization of nonforceful verbal resistance (e.g., reason, plead, quarrel) was predicted by perpetrator aggression and previous sexual victimization. Women’s immobility (e.g., turn cold, freeze) during the assault that took place over the interim was predicted by experiences of childhood sexual victimization and previous sexual victimization.

First published on February 11, 2008, doi:10.1177/0886260507313531

Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2008;23:571.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
T. Bryant-Davis, H. Chung, and S. Tillman
From the Margins to the Center: Ethnic Minority Women and the Mental Health Effects of Sexual Assault
Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2009; 10(4): 330 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]