|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Representative Sampling of Maritally Violent and Nonviolent CouplesA Feasibility Study
Coreen Farris
Indiana University-Bloomington
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Indiana University-Bloomington
Despite the methodological advantages of representative sampling, few researchers in the field of marital violence have employed random samples for laboratory assessments of couples. The current study tests the feasibility and sampling success of three recruitment methods: (a) random digit dialing, (b) directory-assisted recruitment, and (c) a hybrid method. The number of successful telephone contacts with couples does not differ across the three methods; most successful calls contact nonviolent couples. The sample recruited through all three methods does not appear to match the demographics of the calling area, and all methods require a high monetary and human resource investment.
Key Words: sampling recruitment intimate partner violence marital violence
References
- Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
- Dillman, D.A., Gallegos, J.G., & Frey, J.H. (1976). Reducing refusal rates for telephone interviews. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(1), 66-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Groves, R.M., & Couper, M.P. (1998). Nonresponse in household surveys. New York: Wiley.
- Harris & Associates. (1985). Second national family violence survey: Survey methodology. Unpublished manuscript.
- Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smutzler, N., & Sandin, E. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence: Part I: Maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65-99.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(1), 141-151.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Schafer, J., Caetano, R., & Clark, C.L. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence among U.S. couples. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1702-1704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Slattery, M.L., Edwards, S.L., Caan, B.J., Kerber, R.A., & Potter, J.D. (1995). Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 5, 245-249.[CrossRef]
- Slep, A.M.S., Heyman, R.E., Williams, M. C., Van Dyke, C. E., & O'Leary S. G. (2006). Using random telephone sampling to recruit generalizable samples for family violence studies. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 680-689.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Straus, M.A. (1979). Measuring intra family conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Straus, M.A., & Gelles, R.J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465-479.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 22, No. 12,
1613-1622 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260507306500

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|