This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GONDOLF, E. W. Articles by STUEHLING, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by GONDOLF, E. W. Articles by STUEHLING, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Court Response to Petitions for Civil Protection Orders

Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP)

JOYCE MCWILLIAMS

Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP)

BARBARA HART

Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence

JANE STUEHLING

Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Civil protection orders offer abused women a legal means to maintain their residences apart from the abuser and exert some autonomy in their relationships. The implementation of protection order statutes remains, however, largely unclear. Court records were examined for 200 petitioners randomly selected from 674 petitions for protection orders filed in one Pennsylvania county court during the year 1990. Court dockets, court petitions, and protection orders were coded for petitioner background, court factors, case disposition, and protective provisions. Approximately three quarters (76%) of the petitioners did receive a final protection order. In the majority of cases not receiving a protection order, the petitioners withdrew or dropped their petitions. The final protection orders limited the batterer's contact in some way and prohibited his future acts of abuse. However, the provisions regarding restricted contact, child custody and visitation, financial support, and property allocation were much less extensive than requested. Relevant background factors and court factors were not significantly associated with the outcome of the case, except for being in a marriage relationship. While protection orders were liberally granted, the provisions for the orders appeared inadequate to ensure separation from the abuser, given the low financial status of many petitioners and the abuser's visitation or joint custody of the children. Means to ensure more extensive and more comprehensive provisions may be needed.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 9, No. 4, 503-517 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/088626094009004005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Logan and R. Walker Civil Protective Order Outcomes: Violations and Perceptions of Effectiveness J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2009; 24(4): 675 - 692. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Postmus Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders: A Guide for Advocates Affilia, November 1, 2007; 22(4): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Shannon, T. Logan, and J. Cole Intimate Partner Violence, Relationship Status, and Protective Orders Protective Orders: Does "Living in Sin" Entail a Different Experience? J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2007; 22(9): 1114 - 1129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Logan, L. Shannon, J. Cole, and R. Walker The Impact of Differential Patterns of Physical Violence and Stalking on Mental Health and Help-Seeking Among Women With Protective Orders Violence Against Women, September 1, 2006; 12(9): 866 - 886. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Vittes and S. B. Sorenson Are Temporary Restraining Orders More Likely to Be Issued When Applications Mention Firearms? Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 266 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Romkens Protecting Prosecution: Exploring the Powers of Law in an Intervention Program for Domestic Violence Violence Against Women, February 1, 2006; 12(2): 160 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Logan, L. Shannon, and R. Walker Protective Orders in Rural and Urban Areas: A Multiple Perspective Study Violence Against Women, July 1, 2005; 11(7): 876 - 911. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Jordan Intimate Partner Violence and the Justice System: An Examination of the Interface J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2004; 19(12): 1412 - 1434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Walker, T. Logan, C. E. Jordan, and J. C. Campbell An Integrative Review of Separation in the Context of Victimization: Consequences and Implications for Women Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2004; 5(2): 143 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]