Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KOSS, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KOSS, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 8, No. 2, 198-222 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/088626093008002004

Other

Detecting the Scope of Rape

A Review of Prevalence Research Methods

MARY P. KOSS

University of Arizona

This article focuses on rape prevalence research and examines the relationship between measurement methods and level of rape detection. After a brief overview of empirical data, the relative threat to the validity of prevalence estimates posed by fabrication versus nondisclosure is weighed. Then various methodological choices and their relationship to the magnitude of prevalence estimates are examined. Addressed are the definitions underlying the studies, the questions used to elicit reports of rape, the context in which rape questioning occurred, the confidentiality of the responses, the method of data collection, and the sample integrity. The conclusions include 10 recommendations for the design of future studies of rape prevalence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
P. S. Nurius and R. J. Macy
Heterogeneity Among Violence-Exposed Women: Applying Person-Oriented Research Methods
J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2008; 23(3): 389 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. L. Dunkle, R. K. Jewkes, H. C. Brown, M. Yoshihama, G. E. Gray, J. A. McIntyre, and S. D. Harlow
Prevalence and Patterns of Gender-based Violence and Revictimization among Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Soweto, South Africa
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 160(3): 230 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
L. E. Adams-Curtis and G. B. Forbes
College Women's Experiences of Sexual Coercion: A Review of Cultural, Perpetrator, Victim, and Situational Variables
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2004; 5(2): 91 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
M. D. SCHWARTZ
Methodological Issues in the Use of Survey Data for Measuring and Characterizing Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women, August 1, 2000; 6(8): 815 - 838.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sex AbuseHome page
B. M. Maletzky
On the Offensive
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, January 1, 1998; 10(4): 269 - 272.
[PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. G. KILPATRICK
Introduction
J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1993; 8(2): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]