Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CAULFIELD, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by RIGGS, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CAULFIELD, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by RIGGS, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

The Assessment of Dating Aggression

Empirical Evaluation of the Conflict Tactics Scale

MARIE B. CAULFIELD

University of Delaware

DAVID S. RIGGS

Medical College of Pennsylvania at Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Two studies were conducted to examine the component structure of response patterns on the Conflict Tactics Scale in dating samples. In Study 1, CTS responses for 268 male and 399 female unmarried college students were subjected to principal components analyses. For both sexes, these analyses revealed a 4-component solution (Reasoning, Verbal Aggression/Coercion, Physical Aggression/Threat, and Severe Aggression). In Study 2, the component solution was replicated with a combined-sex sample of 288 (116 men, 172 women) unmarried college students. The component solution found in these samples was consistent with those found in earlier studies of the CTS with married samples. Differences between the empirically supported component structure and the rationally derived aggression indices for the CTS may have implications for understanding the underlying dimensions tapped by the CTS.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 7, No. 4, 549-558 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/088626092007004010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
N. M. Capezza and X. B. Arriaga
Factors Associated With Acceptance of Psychological Aggression Against Women
Violence Against Women, June 1, 2008; 14(6): 612 - 633.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. Cogan and B. C. Ballinger III
Alcohol Problems and the Differentiation of Partner, Stranger, and General Violence
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2006; 21(7): 924 - 935.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
A. D. Cast, D. Schweingruber, and N. Berns
Childhood Physical Punishment and Problem Solving in Marriage
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2006; 21(2): 244 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. D. Dasgupta
A Framework for Understanding Women's Use of Nonlethal Violence in Intimate Heterosexual Relationships
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1364 - 1389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. S. RIGGS
Relationship Problems and Dating Aggression: A Potential Treatment Target
J Interpers Violence, March 1, 1993; 8(1): 18 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]