This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by URQUIZA, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by URQUIZA, A. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Retrospective Methodology in Family Violence Research

Our Duty to Report Past Abuse

University of California, Davis Medical Center

Child abuse research using retrospective research designs has proven beneficial to researchers and clinicians in describing both short- and long-term effects of abuse, and in identifying factors that serve to mediate outcomes to child maltreatment. Points of conflict between this research design and current child abuse reporting laws, as well as possible biases that may influence results of the researcher's investigation, are addressed in this article. It is the position of this article that in research involving children under 18 years of age, current child abuse reporting laws are quite clear. Although researchers are not specifically identified as mandated reporters (although in certain states all members of the general population are mandated reporters), they nonetheless have a duty to report any "reasonable suspicion" of child abuse or neglect when this suspicion derives from their research study. Although this mandate may not apply when subjects are of legal age, researchers still have the responsibility to address and evaluate the safety of subjects or others (e.g., siblings). It is suggested that researchers acquire sufficient information from their subjects to make a determination regarding the safety of the subjects and others. The failure of current child abuse reporting laws to address adults does not leave the researcher without ethical responsibilities or fear of civil suit. In an area of research where the implicit intent is to prevent or relieve the pain or distress caused by others, it may be important to ensure that our research paradigms reflect this intent.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 6, No. 1, 119-126 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/088626091006001012


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Jordan Advancing the Study of Violence Against Women: Evolving Research Agendas Into Science Violence Against Women, April 1, 2009; 15(4): 393 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Langford Developing a Safety Protocol in Qualitative Research Involving Battered Women Qual Health Res, January 1, 2000; 10(1): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]