|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A System for the Classification of Child MolestersReliability and Application
RAYMOND A. KNIGHT
Brandeis University and Massachusetts Treatment Center
DANIEL LEE CARTER
Brandeis University and Massachusetts Treatment Center
ROBERT ALAN PRENTKY
Brandeis University and Massachusetts Treatment Center
Although descriptive studies have demonstrated that child molesters are heterogeneous on numerous variables (Knight, Rosenberg, & Schneider, 1985), no classification systems have been constructed that divide child molesters into reliable, cohesive subgroups. This critical gap in our knowledge hampers the efficacy of clinical decisions about the treatment, management, and disposition of these offenders. The child molester typology presented here has been developed to fulfill the need for a clearly operationalized, reliable, valid system to address the problem of the manifest diversity of these offenders. This typology is the product of a research program that has integrated both deductive/rational and inductive/empirical strategies for generating and testing taxonomic systems (Knight, 1988; Knight & Prentky, in press). We present here the criteria for applying this system and the interrater reliability coefficients for assigning a sample of committed offenders to these proposed types.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 4, No. 1,
3-23 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/088626089004001001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Harris, P. Mazerolle, and R. A. Knight
Understanding Male Sexual Offending: A Comparison of General and Specialist Theories
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
October 1, 2009;
36(10):
1051 - 1069.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Walters, R. A. Knight, and D. Thornton
The Latent Structure of Sexual Violence Risk: A Taxometric Analysis of Widely Used Sex Offender Actuarial Risk Measures
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
March 1, 2009;
36(3):
290 - 306.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Freeman
Predictors of Rearrest for Rapists and Child Molesters On Probation
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
June 1, 2007;
34(6):
752 - 768.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hunter, A. J. Figueredo, N. M. Malamuth, and J. V Becker
Juvenile Sex Offenders: Toward the Development of a Typology
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
January 1, 2003;
15(1):
27 - 48.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Richardson, T.P. Kelly, S.R. Bhate, and F. Graham
Group Differences in Abuser and Abuse Characteristics in a British Sample of Sexually Abusive Adolescents
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
January 1, 1997;
9(3):
239 - 257.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Brannon and R. Troyer
Adolescent Sex Offenders: Investigating Adult Commitment-Rates Four Years Later
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
December 1, 1995;
39(4):
317 - 326.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ward, S. M. Hudson, and K. G. France
Self-Reported Reasons for Offending Behavior in Child Molesters
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
January 1, 1993;
6(2):
139 - 148.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. KNIGHT
An Assessment of the Concurrent Validity of a Child Molester Typology
J Interpers Violence,
June 1, 1989;
4(2):
131 - 150.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|