Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanzile-Tamsen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Livingston, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 20, No. 7, 813-832 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260505276071
© 2005 SAGE Publications

The Impact of Sexual Assault History and Relationship Context on Appraisal of and Responses to Acquaintance Sexual Assault Risk

Carol Vanzile-Tamsen

Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, ctamsen{at}ria.buffalo.edu

Maria Testa

Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo

Jennifer A. Livingston

Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo

Although a major predictor of sexual victimization is previous victimization, the mechanism underlying this effect is not well understood. Sexual assault history’s impact on appraisal of and responses to sexual assault risk was examined in an experimental analog study. Intimacy with perpetrator was also examined as a potential contributor to appraisal and responses. Young women varying in sexual assault history were randomly assigned to receive a scenario in which type of perpetrator was manipulated (someone just met, friend, date, boyfriend). Respondents appraised the man’s actions as sexual interest or assault and indicated intentions to respond (resistance and nonresistance). Sexual assault history did not directly influence appraisal or intended responses but had modest indirect effects on resistance via sexual assertiveness. The primary influence on appraisal and responses was perpetrator intimacy. Women facing advances within a more intimate relationship were less likely to appraise those advances as threatening and less likely to resist.

Key Words: sexual assault risk • risk appraisal • acquaintance rape • rape • perpetration • resistance • assertiveness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
A. H. Winslett and A. M. Gross
Sexual Boundaries: An Examination of the Importance of Talking Before Touching
Violence Against Women, May 1, 2008; 14(5): 542 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
C. A. Gidycz, A. Van Wynsberghe, and K. M. Edwards
Prediction of Women's Utilization of Resistance Strategies in a Sexual Assault Situation: A Prospective Study
J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 571 - 588.
[Abstract] [PDF]