Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zink, T.
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zink, T.
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intimate Partner Violence Research in the Health Care Setting

What Are Appropriate and Feasible Methodological Standards?

Therese Zink

Olmsted Medical Center

Frank Putnam

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

The past 20 years of research has exposed the profound cost of intimate partner violence (IPV) in health care problems and health care dollars for victims and bystanders. As a result, professional organizations encourage clinicians to identify IPV victims and to refer them to community resources. To date there is little evidence to show the value of these efforts, and many completed studies are criticized for methodological weaknesses. IPV studies are challenging to design, and the double-blind randomized controlled trial may be an impossible standard. To move forward, funders and study committees are encouraged to reassess the standards for IPV research methodologies.

Key Words: methodology • intimate partner violence • domestic violence • research design • delivery of health care • methodological challenges

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 20, No. 4, 365-372 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260504267548
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
J. Spangaro, A. B. Zwi, and R. Poulos
The Elusive Search for Definitive Evidence on Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence
Trauma Violence Abuse, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 55 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
S. B. Plichta
Interactions Between Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and the Health Care System: Policy and Practice Implications
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 226 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]