Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 20, No. 2, 212-217 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260504267740
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Twenty Years of Progress in Violence Risk Assessment

R. Karl Hanson

Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada

Violence risk assessment has advanced considerably in the last 20 years. In the 1980s, leading professionals questioned the very possibility of valid violence risk assessments; now, many of the major risk factors have been identified, and professional debate focuses on how best to combine these risk factors into meaningful evaluations. An important contributor to this advance in knowledge has been the rise of meta-analytic reviews. Through quantitative summaries, the cumulative findings of small, potentially insignificant studies have provided important answers to questions concerning the effective assessment and treatment of violent offenders.

Key Words: violence • risk prediction • meta-analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Langton, H. E. Barbaree, K. T. Hansen, L. Harkins, and E. J. Peacock
Reliability and Validity of the Static-2002 Among Adult Sexual Offenders With Reference to Treatment Status
Criminal Justice and Behavior, May 1, 2007; 34(5): 616 - 640.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
A. L. Gentry, C. N. Dulmus, and M. T. Theriot
Comparing Sex Offender Risk Classification Using the Static-99 and LSI-R Assessment Instruments
Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2005; 15(6): 557 - 563.
[Abstract] [PDF]