|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Toward a Multidimensional Model for Sexual Recidivism Risk
Dennis M. Doren
Sand Ridge Secure Treatment CenterEvaluation Unit
The paradigm underlying current sexual offender recidivism risk assessment procedures conceptualizes such risk in a linear fashion, ranging on a single continuum from 0% to 100%. Each risk and protective characteristic thought of relevance in an evaluation is used as an indicator of increased or decreased risk, respectively, along that same continuum. This conceptualization of risk was useful as a starting place for the application of empirically supported risk and protective factors. On the other hand, this perspective is likely simplistic and therefore potentially results in some errors that a more sophisticated assessment model would avoid. Recent research findings indicate support for a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. This article explores what we already know about the existence of multiple risk dimensions, what those dimensions may be, and which risk factors assess which dimension. Implications for risk assessment procedures are discussed including how risk evaluations using this model might be conducted.
Key Words: risk assessment recidivism multidimensional model actuarial
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 8,
835-856 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260504266882

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Canales, M. E. Olver, and S. C. P. Wong
Construct Validity of the Violence Risk Scale--Sexual Offender Version for Measuring Sexual Deviance
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
December 1, 2009;
21(4):
474 - 492.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. Barbaree, C. M. Langton, R. Blanchard, and J. M. Cantor
Aging Versus Stable Enduring Traits as Explanatory Constructs in Sex Offender Recidivism: Partitioning Actuarial Prediction Into Conceptually Meaningful Components
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
May 1, 2009;
36(5):
443 - 465.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Kingston, P. M. Yates, P. Firestone, K. Babchishin, and J. M. Bradford
Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Risk Matrix 2000: A Comparison With the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
December 1, 2008;
20(4):
466 - 484.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Nunes and F. Cortoni
Dropout From Sex-Offender Treatment and Dimensions of Risk of Sexual Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
January 1, 2008;
35(1):
24 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Langton, H. E. Barbaree, K. T. Hansen, L. Harkins, and E. J. Peacock
Reliability and Validity of the Static-2002 Among Adult Sexual Offenders With Reference to Treatment Status
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
May 1, 2007;
34(5):
616 - 640.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Thornton
Age and Sexual Recidivism: A Variable Connection
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
April 1, 2006;
18(2):
123 - 135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Doren
What Do We Know About the Effect of Aging on Recidivism Risk for Sexual Offenders?
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
April 1, 2006;
18(2):
137 - 157.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. Barbaree, C. M. Langton, and E. J. Peacock
The Factor Structure of Static Actuarial Items: Its Relation to Prediction
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
April 1, 2006;
18(2):
207 - 226.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|