This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sullivan, C. M. Articles by Cain, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sullivan, C. M. Articles by Cain, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ethical and Safety Considerations When Obtaining Information From or About Battered Women for Research Purposes

Michigan State University

Debra Cain

Michigan Domestic Violence Prevention and Treatment Board

More and more researchers, evaluators, and policy makers are recognizing that in order to best understand the factors precipitating, supporting, and prohibiting intimate violence against women, we must often gather information directly from battered women themselves. Such data collection, however, is not without its risks to the women involved in such studies. It is important that researchers and evaluators consider ethical issues, especially but not limited to those related to safety and confidentiality, before attempting to gather information either directly from battered women or through their records or files. This article provides a number of practical strategies and protocols that have been used successfully when gathering sensitive information from and about women with abusive partners.

Key Words: safety • confidentiality • ethical • domestic violence

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 5, 603-618 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260504263249


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. F. Rothman, J. Meade, and M. R. Decker E-mail Use Among a Sample of Intimate Partner Violence Shelter Residents Violence Against Women, June 1, 2009; 15(6): 736 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Campbell, A. E. Adams, S. M. Wasco, C. E. Ahrens, and T. Sefl Training Interviewers for Research on Sexual Violence: A Qualitative Study of Rape Survivors' Recommendations for Interview Practice Violence Against Women, May 1, 2009; 15(5): 595 - 617. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Campbell and A. E. Adams Why Do Rape Survivors Volunteer for Face-to-Face Interviews?: A Meta-Study of Victims' Reasons For and Concerns About Research Participation J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2009; 24(3): 395 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Haviland, V. Frye, and V. Rajah Harnessing the Power of Advocacy-Research Collaborations: Lessons From the Field. Feminist Criminology, October 1, 2008; 3(4): 247 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Campbell, A. E. Adams, and D. Patterson Methodological Challenges of Collecting Evaluation Data From Traumatized Clients/Consumers: A Comparison of Three Methods American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 369 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. R. Hlavka, C. Kruttschnitt, and K. C. Carbone-Lopez Revictimizing the Victims?: Interviewing Women About Interpersonal Violence J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2007; 22(7): 894 - 920. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Campbell, D. Patterson, and L. F. Lichty The Effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs: A Review of Psychological, Medical, Legal, and Community Outcomes Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2005; 6(4): 313 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Humphreys, P. W. Sharps, and J. C. Campbell What We Know and What We Still Need to Learn J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2005; 20(2): 182 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]