This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. Articles by Kramer, V. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. Articles by Kramer, V. L. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Domestic Violence Family Issues Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Attributions about Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse

Results From an Analogue Study

University of South Alabama

Rania K. Shlien-Dellinger

Puckett Institute

Matthew T. Huss

Creighton University

Vertrie L. Kramer

Nebraska Department of Roads

This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim’s rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.

Key Words: attributions • domestic violence • physical and psychological abuse • sex of perceiver

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 4, 484-498 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503262084


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Yamawaki, J. Ostenson, and C. R. Brown The Functions of Gender Role Traditionality, Ambivalent Sexism, Injury, and Frequency of Assault on Domestic Violence Perception: A Study Between Japanese and American College Students Violence Against Women, September 1, 2009; 15(9): 1126 - 1142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. Capezza and X. B. Arriaga Factors Associated With Acceptance of Psychological Aggression Against Women Violence Against Women, June 1, 2008; 14(6): 612 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. Capezza and X. B. Arriaga You can degrade but you can't hit: Differences in perceptions of psychological versus physical aggression Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 225 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]