Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hevey, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marsa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hevey, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Attachment Styles and Psychological Profiles of Child Sex Offenders in Ireland

Fiona Marsa

Trinity College Dublin

Gary O’Reilly

Alan Carr

University College Dublin

Paul Murphy

Maura O’Sullivan

Irish Prison Clinical Psychology Service

Anthony Cotter

Irish Probation Service

David Hevey

Trinity College Dublin

When 29 child sex offenders, 30 violent offenders, 30 nonviolent offenders, and 30 community controls were compared, a secure adult attachment style was 4 times less common in the child sex offender group than in any of the other three groups. Ninety-three percent of sex offenders had an insecure adult attachment style. Compared with community controls, the child sex offender group reported significantly lower levels of maternal and paternal care and significantly higher levels of maternal and paternal overprotection during their childhood. Compared with all three comparison groups, the child sexual offenders reported significantly more emotional loneliness and a more external locus of control. With respect to anger management, the child sexual offenders’ profile more closely approximated those of nonviolent offenders and community controls than that of violent offenders.

Key Words: child sexual abuse • perpetrators • attachment • bonding • loneliness • locus of control • anger

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 2, 228-251 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503260328


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
E. Wood and S. Riggs
Adult Attachment, Cognitive Distortions, and Views of Self, Others, and the Future Among Child Molesters
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, September 1, 2009; 21(3): 375 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
E. Wood and S. Riggs
Predictors of Child Molestation: Adult Attachment, Cognitive Distortions, and Empathy
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2008; 23(2): 259 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
M. T. Daversa and R. A. Knight
A Structural Examination of the Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Children in Adolescent Sexual Offenders
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2007; 34(10): 1313 - 1333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
W. H. J. Martens and G. B. Palermo
Loneliness and Associated Violent Antisocial Behavior: Analysis of the Case Reports of Jeffrey Dahmer and Dennis Nilsen
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2005; 49(3): 298 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]