Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolen, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 2, 185-211 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503260324

Ambivalence of Nonoffending Guardians after Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure

Rebecca M. Bolen

Boston University

J. Leah Lamb

St. Luke’s Children’s Hospital

A concern in the intervention with sexually abused children is the support of their nonoffending guardians after disclosure of the abuse. Approximately a third of nonoffending guardians respond with vacillation in support, and these nonoffending guardians are at greater risk for having their children removed. This article reconceptualizes vacillation in support as an ambivalent response. Drawing on the interdisciplinary literature, this article suggests that ambivalence in support reflects the confluence between the nonoffending guardian’s valence toward the child and perpetrator. This article further proposes that ambivalence is normative when the costs of disclosure are high and when the nonoffending guardian is ambivalent/preoccupied in attachment. Ambivalence may also be both a precursor to and an effect of the traumatic experience of the disclosure on the nonoffending guardian. In a study of 30 nonoffending mothers whose partners sexually abused their children, these relationships were supported.

Key Words: ambivalence • child sexual abuse • guardian support • maternal support


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
C. A. Plummer and J. Eastin
The Effect of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations/ Investigations on the Mother/Child Relationship
Violence Against Women, October 1, 2007; 13(10): 1053 - 1071.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
R. M. Bolen and J. Leah Lamb
Can Nonoffending Mothers of Sexually Abused Children Be Both Ambivalent and Supportive?
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2007; 12(2): 191 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]