This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frese, B. Articles by Megías, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frese, B. Articles by Megías, J. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Social Perception of Rape

How Rape Myth Acceptance Modulates the Influence of Situational Factors

Miguel Moya

Jesús L. Megías

University of Granada, Spain

This study assessed the role of rape myth acceptance (RMA) and situational factors in the perception of three different rape scenarios (date rape, marital rape, and stranger rape). One hundred and eighty-two psychology undergraduates were asked to emit four judgements about each rape situation: victim responsibility, perpetrator responsibility, intensity of trauma, and likelihood to report the crime to the police. It was hypothesized that neither RMA nor situational factors alone can explain how rape is perceived; it is the interaction between these two factors that best account for social reactions to sexual aggression. The results generally supported the authors’ hypothesis: Victim blame, estimation of trauma, and the likelihood of reporting the crime to the police were best explained by the interaction between observer characteristics, such as RMA, and situational clues. That is, the less stereotypic the rape situation was, the greater was the influence of attitudes toward rape on attributions.

Key Words: attitudes • rape myths • victim blame

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Ferro, J. Cermele, and A. Saltzman Current Perceptions of Marital Rape: Some Good and Not-So-Good News J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2008; 23(6): 764 - 779. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Littleton, C. Radecki Breitkopf, and A. Berenson Beyond the Campus: Unacknowledged Rape Among Low-Income Women Violence Against Women, March 1, 2008; 14(3): 269 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Munge, A. M. Pomerantz, J. C. Pettibone, and J. W. Falconer The Influence of Length of Marriage and Fidelity Status on Perception of Marital Rape J Interpers Violence, October 1, 2007; 22(10): 1332 - 1339. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Donovan To Blame or Not To Blame: Influences of Target Race and Observer Sex on Rape Blame Attribution J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2007; 22(6): 722 - 736. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Long, S. E. Ullman, L. L. Starzynski, S. M. Long, and G. E. Mason Age and Educational Differences in African American Women's Sexual Assault Experiences Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2007; 2(2): 117 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Yamawaki Rape Perception and the Function of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender-Role Traditionality J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2007; 22(4): 406 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]