This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hollin, C. R. Articles by Palmer, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hollin, C. R. Articles by Palmer, E. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Level of Service Inventory-Revised Profiles of Violent and Nonviolent Prisoners

University of Leicester

Emma J. Palmer

University of Leicester

Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) assessments were conducted on 251 male prisoners beginning prison sentences in six English prisons. The prisoners who were classified as violent, on the basis of either current or previous convictions, scored significantly higher than the nonviolent prisoners on the four LSI-R subscales of Criminal History, Companions, Education and Employment, and Alcohol and Drugs. In addition, those prisoners with a record of violent offenses gave higher total LSI-R scores, indicating an overall higher risk of recidivism. Multivariate analysis using the LSI-R subscales to classify the higher risk violent prisoners and minimum-risk nonviolent prisoners basically confirmed the findings of the univariate analysis. The implications of the findings for informing practice with violent offenders are discussed in terms of screening for intensity of service delivery and identification of targets for change. It is suggested that screening for drug and alcohol problems should be a prerequisite to working with violent offenders.

Key Words: criminogenic needs • prisoners • LSI-R

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 9, 1075-1086 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503254514


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C.-I Hsu, P. Caputi, and M. K. Byrne The Level of Service Inventory--Revised (LSI-R): A Useful Risk Assessment Measure for Australian Offenders? Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 728 - 740. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Kelly and W. N. Welsh The Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory--Revised for Drug-Involved Offenders Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2008; 35(7): 819 - 831. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Hollin, J. McGuire, J. C. Hounsome, R. M. Hatcher, C. A.L. Bilby, and E. J. Palmer Cognitive Skills Behavior Programs for Offenders in the Community: A Reconviction Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 35(3): 269 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Holtfreter and R. Cupp Gender and Risk Assessment: The Empirical Status of the LSI-R for Women Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 363 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Hollin and E. J. Palmer The Level of Service Inventory-Revised Profile of English Prisoners: Risk and Reconviction Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2006; 33(3): 347 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Gentry, C. N. Dulmus, and M. T. Theriot Comparing Sex Offender Risk Classification Using the Static-99 and LSI-R Assessment Instruments Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2005; 15(6): 557 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF]