Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mills, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmati, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mills, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmati, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 8, 891-904 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503253880
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Predicting Violent Behavior through A Static-Stable Variable Lens

Jeremy F. Mills, Ph.D.

Correctional Service of Canada

Daryl G. Kroner, Ph.D.

Correctional Service of Canada

Toni Hemmati, BAH

Carleton University

This study examines the differential relationship of criminogenic domains to violent and nonviolent recidivism in a sample of predominantly violent offenders. In addition, the criminogenic domains are examined through a static-stable variable dichotomy. The results support previously published retrospective studies that found different domains associated with violent and nonviolent offending. In addition, the results showed that stable variables add to the prediction of both violent and nonviolent behavior after accounting for the most salient static variables. The results are discussed within the context of improving risk prediction.

Key Words: recidivism • prediction • violence • dynamic variables


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. R. Hollin and E. J. Palmer
The Level of Service Inventory-Revised Profile of English Prisoners: Risk and Reconviction Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2006; 33(3): 347 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. K. Hanson
Twenty Years of Progress in Violence Risk Assessment
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2005; 20(2): 212 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. F. Mills
Advances in the Assessment and Prediction of Interpersonal Violence
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2005; 20(2): 236 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. F. Mills, D. G. Kroner, and T. Hemmati
The Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA): The Prediction of General and Violent Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 2004; 31(6): 717 - 733.
[Abstract] [PDF]