Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendy, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hendy, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, K. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 6, 645-665 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503251180

Comparison of Six Models for Violent Romantic Relationships in College Men and Women

Helen M. Hendy

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

Kristen Weiner

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

John Bakerofskie

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

Doreen Eggen

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

Cheryl Gustitus

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

Kelli C. McLeod

Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill

Six types of parent and partner violence were compared as possible models for violence in the romantic relationships of 608 college students (164 men, 444 women). Participants used the Conflict Tactics Scale to report violence to and from the present partner, as well as violence from mother to father, father to mother, mother to participant, father to participant, and past partners to participant. Stepwise multiple regression revealed that violence to the present partner was explained by both partner and parent models of violence for men (R2 = .39) and women (R2 = .51), with violence from the present partner found to be the most powerful model. Violence received from the mother was the most powerful parental model for violence in the present romantic relationship, but for women it was associated with receiving violence, whereas for men it was associated with both receiving and inflicting violence.

Key Words: violent relationships • models


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. Weston, L. L. Marshall, and A. L. Coker
Women's Motives for Violent and Nonviolent Behaviors in Conflicts
J Interpers Violence, August 1, 2007; 22(8): 1043 - 1065.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
J. Vezina and M. Hebert
Risk Factors for Victimization in Romantic Relationships of Young Women: A Review of Empirical Studies and Implications for Prevention
Trauma Violence Abuse, January 1, 2007; 8(1): 33 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. C. Swan and D. L. Snow
The Development of a Theory of Women's Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships.
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2006; 12(11): 1026 - 1045.
[Abstract] [PDF]