Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogat, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bogat, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, W. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Predicting the Psychosocial Effects of Interpersonal Partner Violence (IPV)

How much does a Woman's History of IPV Matter?

G. Anne Bogat

Michigan State University

Alytia A. Levendosky

Michigan State University

Sally Theran

Michigan State University

Alexander Von Eye

Michigan State University

William S. Davidson

Michigan State University

Women's (N = 205) IPV experiences were assessed during their pregnancies, in the year before their pregnancies, and with their previous partners. The study explored whether psychosocial indicators and severity of violence could be predicted from a woman's continuity and history of IPV. Two 4-group classifications—partner (IPV experiences across partners) and time (history of IPV experiences)—and one 2-group classification (IPV or no IPV in the past 6 months) were compared. Both four-group classifications accounted for more variance than did the two-group. Within the four-group classifications, most of the significant differences on psychosocial out-comes and severity of IPV were between the no IPV and chronic IPV groups (IPV experiences with two partners and across three different time periods). However, the groups that also fared poorly were those who experienced recent IPV and continuity of IPV across time with their current partners.

Key Words: domestic violence • partner violence • history of violence • chronic violence

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 11, 1271-1291 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503256657
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
P. S. Nurius and R. J. Macy
Heterogeneity Among Violence-Exposed Women: Applying Person-Oriented Research Methods
J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2008; 23(3): 389 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
S. L. Staggs, S. M. Long, G. E. Mason, S. Krishnan, and S. Riger
Intimate Partner Violence, Social Support, and Employment in the Post-Welfare Reform Era
J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2007; 22(3): 345 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
S. A. Theran, C. M. Sullivan, G. A. Bogat, and C. S. Stewart
Abusive Partners and Ex-Partners: Understanding the Effects of Relationship to the Abuser on Women's Well-Being
Violence Against Women, October 1, 2006; 12(10): 950 - 969.
[Abstract] [PDF]