Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 10, 1222-1239 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260503256654
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Gender Differences in Sexual Harassment and Coercion in College Students

Developmental, Individual, and Situational Determinants

Kim S. Ménard

Pennsylvania State University

Gordon C. Nagayama Hall

University of Oregon

Amber H. Phung

Pennsylvania State University

Marian F. Erian Ghebrial

Pennsylvania State University

Lynette Martin

Pennsylvania State University

Differences in male (N = 148) and female (N = 278) college students' use of sexually harassing and coercive behaviors were investigated. Men were twice as likely to be sexually harassing and 3 times more likely to be sexually coercive as women. Among men, sexual harassment was predicted by child sexual abuse, hostility, adversarial heterosexual beliefs, and alcohol expectancy, with the latter mediating the effects of aggression. Sexual coercion was predicted by adult sexual victimization and alcohol expectancy, with alcohol expectancy again mediating the effect of aggression. Among women, sexual harassment was predicted by adult sexual victimization, adversarial heterosexual beliefs, aggression, and alcohol expectancy, with aggression mediating the effect of adversarial heterosexual beliefs and alcohol expectancy mediating the effect of aggression. Sexual coercion was predicted by a hostile personality, which mediated the effects of both child and adult sexual victimization. These findings suggest both gender similarities and differences in determinants of sexual aggression.

Key Words: sexual coercion • sexual harassment • gender differences


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
D. Vogt, T. A. Bruce, A. E. Street, and J. Stafford
Attitudes Toward Women and Tolerance for Sexual Harassment Among Reservists
Violence Against Women, September 1, 2007; 13(9): 879 - 900.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
A. Lacasse and M. J. Mendelson
Sexual Coercion Among Adolescents: Victims and Perpetrators
J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2007; 22(4): 424 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]