Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hoke, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 18, No. 1, 3-17 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0886260502238537
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Outcome of a Treatment Program for Adult Sex Offenders

From Prison to Community

Robert J. McGrath

Georgia Cumming

Vermont Department of Corrections

Joy A. Livingston

Flint Springs Consulting

Stephen E. Hoke

Vermont Department of Corrections

This study examined the recidivism rates of 195 adult male sex offenders who were referred to a prison-based cognitive-behavioral treatment program. Of this sample, 56 participants completed treatment, 49 entered but did not complete treatment, and 90 refused treatment services. Although participants were not randomly assigned to treatment conditions, there were no between-group differences on participants’ pre-treatment risk for sexual recidivism as appraised on two actuarial risk measures, the RRASOR and Static-99. Over a mean follow-up period of almost 6 years, the sexual reoffense rate for the completed-treatment group was 5.4% versus 30.6% for the some-treatment and 30.0% for the no-treatment groups. Lower sexual recidivism rates were also found among those participants who received aftercare treatment and correctional supervision services in the community.

Key Words:


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CAREHome page
A. Moster, D. W. Wnuk, and E. L. Jeglic
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Interventions With Sex Offenders
Journal of Correctional Health Care, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 109 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
D. M. Doren and P. M. Yates
Effectiveness of Sex Offender Treatment for Psychopathic Sexual Offenders
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 234 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
L.E. Marshall, W.L. Marshall, Y.M. Fernandez, P.B. Malcolm, and H.M. Moulden
The Rockwood Preparatory Program for Sexual Offenders: Description and Preliminary Appraisal
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 25 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
R. J. McGrath, G. F. Cumming, S. E. Hoke, and M. O. Bonn-Miller
Outcomes in a Community Sex Offender Treatment Program: A Comparison Between Polygraphed and Matched Non-polygraphed Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 381 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Langton, H. E. Barbaree, M. C. Seto, E. J. Peacock, L. Harkins, and K. T. Hansen
Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders: Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of the Static-2002 and Five Other Instruments
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2007; 34(1): 37 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
J. Looman
Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Instruments for Sexual Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 193 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
N. Jones, B. Pelissier, and J. Klein-Saffran
Predicting Sex Offender Treatment Entry Among Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offense Crimes
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, January 1, 2006; 18(1): 83 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. L. L. Polaschek, N. J. Wilson, M. R. Townsend, and L. R. Daly
Cognitive-Behavioral Rehabilitation for High-Risk Violent Offenders: An Outcome Evaluation of the Violence Prevention Unit
J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2005; 20(12): 1611 - 1627.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
A. L. Gentry, C. N. Dulmus, and M. T. Theriot
Comparing Sex Offender Risk Classification Using the Static-99 and LSI-R Assessment Instruments
Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2005; 15(6): 557 - 563.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
K. M. Zgoba and L. M. J. Simon
Recidivism Rates of Sexual Offenders up to 7 Years Later: Does Treatment Matter?
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2005; 30(2): 155 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
J. K. Marques, M. Wiederanders, D. M. Day, C. Nelson, and A. van Ommeren
Effects of a Relapse Prevention Program on Sexual Recidivism: Final Results From California's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP)
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 79 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]