Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POLASCHEK, D. L. L.
Right arrow Articles by SIEGERT, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by POLASCHEK, D. L. L.
Right arrow Articles by SIEGERT, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rapists' Offense Processes

A Preliminary Descriptive Model

DEVON L. L. POLASCHEK

Victoria University of Wellington

STEPHEN M. HUDSON

University of Canterbury

TONY WARD

University of Melbourne

RICHARD J. SIEGERT

Victoria University of Wellington

Models of the offense process set out to provide a description of the cognitive, behavioral, motivational, and contextual factors associated with a particular type of offense. They model the temporal relationships between the variables of interest and focus explicitly on the proximal causes or the how of offending. In this study, qualitative analysis was used to develop a descriptive model of the offense process for 24 adult rapists. Sentenced offenders provided detailed retrospective descriptions of their thoughts, emotions, and behavior prior to and during their most recent rape. These descriptions were analyzed using a grounded-theory approach. The resulting preliminary model contained the following six phases: background factors to the offense, goal formation, approach behavior, offense preparation, the offense, and postoffense behavior. These stages are discussed along with the model's theoretical, research, and clinical implications. The model is consistent with existing multivariate theories of rape and has clear taxonomic potential.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 16, No. 6, 523-544 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/088626001016006003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. C. Chambers, T. Ward, L. Eccleston, and M. Brown
The Pathways Model of Assault: A Qualitative Analysis of the Assault Offender and Offense
J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2009; 24(9): 1423 - 1449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. L. L. Polaschek, S. W. Calvert, and T. A. Gannon
Linking Violent Thinking: Implicit Theory-Based Research with Violent Offenders
J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 75 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
G. Barnett and J. L. Wood
Agency, Relatedness, Inner Peace, and Problem Solving in Sexual Offending: How Sexual Offenders Prioritize and Operationalize Their Good Lives Conceptions
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, December 1, 2008; 20(4): 444 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
T. A. Gannon, M. R. Rose, and T. Ward
A Descriptive Model of the Offense Process for Female Sexual Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 352 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Langton, H. E. Barbaree, L. Harkins, T. Arenovich, J. Mcnamee, E. J. Peacock, A. Dalton, K. T. Hansen, D. Luong, and H. Marcon
Denial and Minimization Among Sexual Offenders: Posttreatment Presentation and Association With Sexual Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2008; 35(1): 69 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
H. C. Wakeling
The Psychometric Validation of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory--Revised with UK Incarcerated Sexual Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 217 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
E. Beauregard and B. Leclerc
An Application of the Rational Choice Approach to the Offending Process of Sex Offenders: A Closer Look at the Decision-making
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 115 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
K. Howells and A. Day
Affective determinants of treatment engagement in violent offenders.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, April 1, 2006; 50(2): 174 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
J. A. Keeling and J. L. Rose
Relapse Prevention with Intellectually Disabled Sexual Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, October 1, 2005; 17(4): 407 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
D. L. L. Polaschek and T. A. Gannon
The Implicit Theories of Rapists: What Convicted Offenders Tell Us
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, October 1, 2004; 16(4): 299 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]