This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by FOLLINGSTAD, D. R. Articles by DeHART, D. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by FOLLINGSTAD, D. R. Articles by DeHART, D. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Defining Psychological Abuse of Husbands Toward Wives

Contexts, Behaviors, and Typologies

University of South Carolina

DANA D. DeHART

University of South Carolina

Little consensus exists regarding which particular behaviors constitute psychological abuse. In this study, a national sample of psychologists rated behaviors by a husband toward his wife as to whether each behavior constituted psychological abuse. For behaviors viewed as "possibly abusive," psychologists indicated whether their judgments would depend on contextual factors of frequency/duration, intent to harm by the perpetrator, and/or perception of harm by the victim. Frequency/duration was more influential than intent to harm or perception of harm in determining whether a behavior was viewed as abusive. Cluster analyses revealed conceptual groups that were labeled (a) threats to physical health; (b) control over physical freedoms; (c) destabilization through intimidation, degradation, isolation/monopolizing, and control; (d) dominating/controlling behaviors; and (e) "inept" relationship behaviors. Threats to physical health, control over physical freedoms, and destabilization were most likely to be perceived as psychological abuse, whereas inept behaviors were rarely viewed as inherently abusive.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 15, No. 9, 891-920 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/088626000015009001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Follingstad The Impact of Psychological Aggression on Women's Mental Health and Behavior: The Status of the Field Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2009; 10(3): 271 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. Capezza and X. B. Arriaga You can degrade but you can't hit: Differences in perceptions of psychological versus physical aggression Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 225 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Shannon, T. Logan, and J. Cole Intimate Partner Violence, Relationship Status, and Protective Orders Protective Orders: Does "Living in Sin" Entail a Different Experience? J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2007; 22(9): 1114 - 1129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Logan, L. Shannon, J. Cole, and J. Swanberg Partner Stalking and Implications for Women's Employment J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2007; 22(3): 268 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Swanberg, C. Macke, and T. Logan Working Women Making It Work: Intimate Partner Violence, Employment, and Workplace Support J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2007; 22(3): 292 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Logan, L. Shannon, J. Cole, and R. Walker The Impact of Differential Patterns of Physical Violence and Stalking on Mental Health and Help-Seeking Among Women With Protective Orders Violence Against Women, September 1, 2006; 12(9): 866 - 886. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Follingstad, C. M. Helff, R. V. Binford, M. M. Runge, and J. D. White Lay Persons' Versus Psychologists' Judgments of Psychologically Aggressive Actions by a Husband and Wife J Interpers Violence, August 1, 2004; 19(8): 916 - 942. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Kaysen, P. A. Resick, and D. Wise Living in Danger: The Impact of Chronic Traumatization and the Traumatic Context on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2003; 4(3): 247 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]