Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KING, N. M. P.
Right arrow Articles by CHURCHILL, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KING, N. M. P.
Right arrow Articles by CHURCHILL, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 15, No. 7, 710-724 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/088626000015007004

Ethical Principles Guiding Research on Child and Adolescent Subjects

NANCY M. P. KING

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

LARRY R. CHURCHILL

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Understanding the ethical principles that should guide research with child and adolescent participants is an essential task for researchers. Principles do not always yield final or uncontroversial answers, but they do serve to clarify and justify decisions, and their use makes individual decisions and research policies more public and open to examination. The principles of scientific importance, scientific soundness, respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, utility, and justice are described herein. The embodiment of these principles in the federal guidelines governing research is discussed, with attention to the differences between wronging and harming subjects and the meaning of informed consent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
M. Ebbesen, S. Andersen, and F. Besenbacher
Ethics in Nanotechnology: Starting From Scratch?
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2006; 26(6): 451 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Child MaltreatHome page
E. D. Knight, J. B. Smith, H. Dubowitz, A. J. Litrownik, J. B. Kotch, D. English, M. D. Everson, and D. K. Runyan
Reporting participants in research studies to child protective services: limited risk to attrition.
Child Maltreat, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 257 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
L. AMAYA-JACKSON, R. R. S. SOCOLAR, W. HUNTER, D. K. RUNYAN, and R. COLINDRES
Directly Questioning Children and Adolescents About Maltreatment: A Review of Survey Measures Used
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2000; 15(7): 725 - 759.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
E. D. KNIGHT, D. K. RUNYAN, H. DUBOWITZ, C. BRANDFORD, J. KOTCH, A. LITROWNIK, and W. HUNTER
Methodological and Ethical Challenges Associated With Child Self-Report of Maltreatment: Solutions Implemented by the LongSCAN Consortium
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2000; 15(7): 760 - 775.
[Abstract] [PDF]