This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by GRUBIN, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by GRUBIN, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Actuarial and Clinical Assessment of Risk in Sex Offenders

University of Newcastle/Newcastle City Health Trust

In this article, actuarial and clinical approaches to risk assessment are reviewed. The benefits and shortcomings of each are examined together with the need to turn statistical significance into clinical relevance. Given the low base rate of sex offending behavior, the heterogeneity of sex offenders, and the variety of contexts in which sex offenses occur, it is argued that neither an actuarial or a clinical approach on its own can, even in theory, provide a reliable means of assessing risk in sexual offenders. This is illustrated in relation to sadistic sexual offenders and the role of fantasy in offending. It is suggested that attention to both phenomenology and actuarial statistics is needed if risk assessment is to have relevance in individual cases.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Craig, D. Thornton, A. Beech, and K. D. Browne The Relationship of Statistical and Psychological Risk Markers to Sexual Reconviction in Child Molesters Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2007; 34(3): 314 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Craig, A. Beech, and K. D. Browne Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales. J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2006; 21(5): 612 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Craig, K. D. Browne, and l. Stringer Comparing Sex Offender Risk Assessment Measures on a UK Sample Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2004; 48(1): 7 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Worling and N. Langstrom Assessment of Criminal Recidivism Risk with Adolescents who have Offended Sexually: A Review Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2003; 4(4): 341 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Craig, K. D. Browne, and I. Stringer Risk Scales And Factors Predictive Of Sexual Offence Recidivism Trauma Violence Abuse, January 1, 2003; 4(1): 45 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Nunes, P. Firestone, J. M. Bradford, D. M. Greenberg, and I. Broom A Comparison of Modified Versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, July 1, 2002; 14(3): 253 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Hudson, D. S. Wales, L. Bakker, and T. Ward Dynamic Risk Factors: The Kia Marama Evaluation Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, April 1, 2002; 14(2): 103 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Bickley and A. R. Beech Classifying Child Abusers: Its Relevance to Theory and Clinical Practice Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2001; 45(1): 51 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]