Journal of Interpersonal Violence

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILLS, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by MALLEY-MORRISON, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 13, No. 6, 682-699 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/088626098013006002

Emotional Commitment, Normative Acceptability, and Attributions for Abusive Partner Behaviors

ROBERT B. MILLS

Boston University

KATHLEEN MALLEY-MORRISON

Boston University

A model of how individuals in premarital relationships arrive at attributions for abusive partner behaviors was assessed. Evaluations of the abusiveness of partner behaviors and level of emotional commitment were of particular interest. Three categories of behaviors were examined: (a) physical abuse, (b) psychological abuse, and (c) sexual abuse. Participants were 103 young adults involved in premarital relationships who completed modified versions of Billingham's Emotional Commitment Scale and Shepard and Campbell's Abusive Behavior Inventory. A series of ANOVAs revealed that commitment level was a significant predictor of premarital attributions. Individuals categorizing themselves as highly committed blamed their partners significantly less for abusive partner behaviors than did individuals reporting moderate levels of commitment. Across all abuse types, females placed more blame on their partners for abusive partner behaviors than did males.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
J. Katz, J. Moore, and P. May
Physical and Sexual Covictimization From Dating Partners: A Distinct Type of Intimate Abuse?
Violence Against Women, August 1, 2008; 14(8): 961 - 980.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
A. R. Perry and M. E. Fromuth
Courtship Violence Using Couple Data: Characteristics and Perceptions
J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2005; 20(9): 1078 - 1095.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. MILLER and K. BUKVA
Intimate Violence Perceptions: Young Adults' Judgments of Abuse Escalating From Verbal Arguments
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2001; 16(2): 133 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. L. Marshall, R. Weston, and T. C. Honeycutt
Does Men's Positivity Moderate or Mediate the Effects of their Abuse on Women's Relationship Quality?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 2000; 17(4-5): 660 - 675.
[Abstract] [PDF]