Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FINKELHOR, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FINKELHOR, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of the Responses of Preadolescents and Adolescents in a National Victimization Survey

DAVID FINKELHOR

University of New Hampshire, Durham

This article compares the responses of 10-and 11-year-olds with those of 12-to 16-year-olds in a national telephone survey of 2,000 youth concerning victimization and victimization-prevention education. Although the overall participation rate was quite good for both groups, parents were slightly more likely to bar the younger children from taking part in the survey. The younger children also disclosed fewer of the most sensitive kinds of victimization, such as sexual abuse. However, by contrast, they did not give any more problematic responses to the key questions dealing with victimization and its details, and their rates for both family and nonfamily assaults, which comprised most of the victimizations, were equivalent to those of older children. The younger children also did not report any greater levels of distress in response to the survey. The few difficulties in interviewing the 10-and 11-year-old children and the quantity of valuable information they can provide suggest that they should be included in victimization surveys.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 13, No. 3, 362-382 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/088626098013003004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Intellect DisabilHome page
S. Reiter, D. N. Bryen, and I. Shachar
Adolescents with intellectual disabilities as victims of abuse
J Intellect Disabil., December 1, 2007; 11(4): 371 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
T. Li, P. K. Trivedi, and J. Guo
Modeling Response Bias in Count: A Structural Approach With an Application to the National Crime Victimization Survey Data
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2003; 31(4): 514 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. A. COHEN, A. P. MANNARINO, L. BERLINER, and E. DEBLINGER
Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: An Empirical Update
J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2000; 15(11): 1202 - 1223.
[Abstract] [PDF]