This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cramer, R. J. Articles by Wakeman, E. E. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cramer, R. J. Articles by Wakeman, E. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Blame Attribution as a Moderator of Perceptions of Sexual Orientation–Based Hate Crimes

The University of Alabama

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Crame001{at}bama.ua.edu.

	Abstract

Blame attribution is a valuable mechanism explaining decision making. However, present literature mainly employs blame attribution as a dependent variable. The shortcoming of this fact is that blame attribution offers a potentially valuable explanatory mechanism for decision making. The authors designed two studies to investigate blame attribution as a moderator of sentencing decisions in sexual orientation–based hate crimes. Study 1 showed that mock jurors punished perpetrators of hate crimes more severely than a control condition. Also, degree of victim blame influenced punitive decision making. In Study 2, mock jurors extended findings that perpetrators of hate crimes are more harshly punished than those of other types of crimes. Victim and perpetrator blame failed to moderate decision making in this more complex scenario. Results are discussed in relation to hate crimes definitions and attribution theory.

First published on July 8, 2009
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009, doi:10.1177/0886260509336962


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?