This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0886260509331507v1 0886260509331507v2 24/10/1673    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Felix, E. D. Articles by Austin, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Felix, E. D. Articles by Austin, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Cluster Analytic Investigation of School Violence Among Diverse Students

¹ University of California, Santa Barbara
² WestEd, Los Alamitos, CA

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: efelix{at}education.ucsb.edu.

	Abstract

Despite nationwide improvements in school safety, victimization at school continues and affects the well-being of a significant number of students. This study uses the California Healthy Kids Survey, a statewide surveillance instrument administered to students in grades 7, 9, and 11 in California (N = 70,600) to address the multiple victimization experiences of students at school. The authors identify subgroups of students based on victimization experience; assess how perceptions of being targeted due to bias relate to cluster membership; and relate victimization to perceptions of school safety, depression, grades, truancy, and internal assets. Victimization rates are given across grade, gender, and ethnicity. Cluster analysis reveals five victimization subgroups—nonvictims, polyvictims, and victims who are predominantly sexually harassed, predominantly physically victimized, and predominantly teased. Compared to nonvictims, students who are victimized report worse outcomes on measures of psychosocial adjustment, with polyvictims faring the worst. Victims are more likely to perceive that they are targeted due to their gender or perceived sexual orientation. Implications for research and practice are provided.

First published on February 27, 2009, doi:10.1177/0886260509331507

Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009;24:1673.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2009
This version was published on March 3, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?